DiAAling up the fees!

The big news today, AA has announced a $15 fee to check a bag. That's for every bag, starting at the first one checked. A second bag is still $25 to check. Yes, yes, some restrictions apply (e.g. Elites, strollers, international travellers, etc.). However, this is a huge step up in the ticky-tack approach we've seen in the market to date.

Consider some of the major ramifications:

• Travellers really can't cross-shop carriers now. This is effectively a $30-$80 fare increase for most leisure travellers that is opaque during shopping.


• Airport operations just got more complicated. It's usually quite a wait to check a bag, so we rarely do. Now every stooge in that line has to complete a payment transaction, too. Not to mention AA probably needs more cash in the drawers at the airport.


• Overhead bin space goes from endangered to extinct. No further explanation required here.


• Gate checking proliferates. This can't speed up the boarding process. Unless AA follows this jab with the haymaker of reduced carry-on size allowance.

This is a pretty strong move by AA. Are they committed if no one else follows? This will be a fun one to watch.

Though possibly not for travellers....

What's in a Name?

We have to wonder what’s going on in the world of naming travel companies. It just seems like there must be a master list of names, or that there is simply too many companies so that naming them is really really hard now.

The latest example is the new airlines from British Airlines called “Openskies”. Yes – it seems to be predicated on the “Open Skies Agreement” that frees up competition for international routes, but it also unfortunately shares the same name as the Navitaire Host system. Painful.

But it gets worse.

Even names that we thought were pretty unique have close twins. Check out the names of YAPTA (known for flight tracking) – and its bizarro-world twins called YATRA (online travel portal). And seriously – check out the logos - even those are similar!!

But it gets worse.

One of the original names WAS Bezurk, an Asian based Metasearcher– but they decided to rename themselves WeGo.com. Which is an awful name to switch to because there is already a WeGoLo.com, which is an European LCC meta. Looks like Bezurk just didn’t go low enough.

There is now TripAdvisor, TripConnect, TripIt, InsideTrip, TripDoor, and CTrip. It’s a complete marketing nightmare. Don't get us started on the fare names. Farelogix, FareCast, FareCompare, etc.

Where is the creativity? Now on the other hand, behold the name Fare Market Value. That's a beaut.

Insurance Against Bad Reporting

We all know that a huge Ancillary Revenue stream for airlines is “Travel Insurance”. Although FMV will admit that we don’t know anyone that actually buys it – we are repeatedly told by airlines that everyone does.
A NY Times article last week explained that people who buy travel insurance tend to think that they are then less likely to lose their bags, get sick or have an accident. The psychology of buying insurance is fairly interesting, but then the NY Times had go and mess it up:

“These results presumably come as no surprise to marketers of travel insurance, which is now purchased by half of American leisure travelers — a fivefold increase since 2001, according to the United States Travel Insurance Association.”

Huh? *HALF* of leisure travelers now purchase travel insurance?? That sounds pretty unbelievable that so many travelers would add this premium to their vacation travel costs. As a result, we decided to do our own research at the US TIA website:

“Utilizing industry and government statistics we estimate that approximately half of Americans who took a cruise, tour or international leisure air trip in 2005 purchased a per trip insurance policy,” notes Brad Finkle, USTIA president.

AHHHH - That still sounds high to FMV, but a little more believable. It's not all leisure travellers, it's the subset purchasing cruises, tours, and international. It's especially logical for tours - because in some cases the cost of travel insurance is actually baked into the package price. However, FMV feels vindicated that the NY times was wrong. We maintain it's going to be a stretch to get half the hapless rubes on the redeye from Vegas to buy insurance. Unless the dealer's showing an ace, of course.