Showing posts with label "Kellogg does Marketing". Show all posts
Showing posts with label "Kellogg does Marketing". Show all posts
Tuesday, June 3, 2008
Southwest = Complete Clarity
Once again, we have to hand it to Southwest. With the US majors struggling to boost revenue and cut costs, not a day goes by without a carrier looking like an anti-consumer enemy of the state in the news. Yet Southwest emerges with their value proposition as clear as ever: Basic air transportation at a decent price with no nickel-diming.
They drove it home with a full page ad in today's WSJ (and likely elsewhere) featuring a coupon (redeemable only on Southwest) reading "DON'T #$*!% ME OVER". The coupon is followed by a list of the various fees Southwest does not impose. The message is simple, and brilliant, and it will resonate not only with Johnny Lunchbucket trying to enjoy some R&R, but also with the coveted business crowd.
They also unveil a new tagline, "Fees Don't Fly With Us". Of course, neither do we (three letters for you, MDW). However, we can understand why people do. And we suspect many more will. Pass the peanuts.
They drove it home with a full page ad in today's WSJ (and likely elsewhere) featuring a coupon (redeemable only on Southwest) reading "DON'T #$*!% ME OVER". The coupon is followed by a list of the various fees Southwest does not impose. The message is simple, and brilliant, and it will resonate not only with Johnny Lunchbucket trying to enjoy some R&R, but also with the coveted business crowd.
They also unveil a new tagline, "Fees Don't Fly With Us". Of course, neither do we (three letters for you, MDW). However, we can understand why people do. And we suspect many more will. Pass the peanuts.
Wednesday, May 21, 2008
What's in a Name?
We have to wonder what’s going on in the world of naming travel companies. It just seems like there must be a master list of names, or that there is simply too many companies so that naming them is really really hard now.
The latest example is the new airlines from British Airlines called “Openskies”. Yes – it seems to be predicated on the “Open Skies Agreement” that frees up competition for international routes, but it also unfortunately shares the same name as the Navitaire Host system. Painful.
But it gets worse.
Even names that we thought were pretty unique have close twins. Check out the names of YAPTA (known for flight tracking) – and its bizarro-world twins called YATRA (online travel portal). And seriously – check out the logos - even those are similar!!
The latest example is the new airlines from British Airlines called “Openskies”. Yes – it seems to be predicated on the “Open Skies Agreement” that frees up competition for international routes, but it also unfortunately shares the same name as the Navitaire Host system. Painful.
But it gets worse.
Even names that we thought were pretty unique have close twins. Check out the names of YAPTA (known for flight tracking) – and its bizarro-world twins called YATRA (online travel portal). And seriously – check out the logos - even those are similar!!
But it gets worse.
One of the original names WAS Bezurk, an Asian based Metasearcher– but they decided to rename themselves WeGo.com. Which is an awful name to switch to because there is already a WeGoLo.com, which is an European LCC meta. Looks like Bezurk just didn’t go low enough.
There is now TripAdvisor, TripConnect, TripIt, InsideTrip, TripDoor, and CTrip. It’s a complete marketing nightmare. Don't get us started on the fare names. Farelogix, FareCast, FareCompare, etc.
Where is the creativity? Now on the other hand, behold the name Fare Market Value. That's a beaut.
Thursday, March 20, 2008
Some Economy Seats are More Economy Than Others
Since FMV moved it’s headquarters to Chicago late last year – we find ourselves flying United a lot. You may think it’s because of their weird faux-cartoon ads that they plaster everywhere – but it’s really because of their “EconomyPlus” seating with extra legroom. After earlier hints, JetBlue has officially jumped on that bandwagon:
JetBlue will reconfigure its Airbus A320 fleet to offer seats with more legroom, and will charge more for those seats. JetBlue is calling the product Even More Legroom, which will offer 38 inches of pitch in the second to fifth rows plus emergency exit rows 10 and 11... The airline will charge $10 each way for short-haul flights (under 600 miles), $15 for medium-haul flights (601 to 1,500 miles) and $20 for long-haul flights (over 1,500 miles).
That’s actually great – but there is also another kicker:
The airline won't be selling Even More Legroom in the GDSs because of "technological limitations," JetBlue said. But the airline added that clients who book via a GDS can go to the Manage Your Flight link on JetBlue's Web site to purchase the extra legroom.
A few FMV points:
1) OK, we just assumed that JetBlue’s marketing department had a down day when they branded their new refundable fare product “Refundable Fares”. But seriously, “Even More Legroom”? Please try a little harder to imply that the old coach seats don't have crappy legroom. You know who will REALLY hate this name?? The call center agents who face this scenario happening 100 times a day:
JetBlue Agent: “Hello, You have reached JetBlue – how may I help you”
Customer: “Uhh, Hi – I bought a seat for my upcoming trip, and I know I get a roomy seat, but I’d now like to purchase EVEN MORE LEGROOM!! Ha Ha Ha”
2) This also has “Ancillary Revenue” written all over it and kind of goes against the Jetblue vein. Fine – you don’t have a “business class” – but you now have the beginnings of tiered system…
3) Finally – and most importantly - we love the fact that this purchase option is not available in the GDS. It’s the mythical “Fourth Cabin” limitation of GDSs; they cannot inventory control this type of stuff, and therefore can’t sell it. But FMV will bet you $10 (Even More Legroom for a short-haul flight) that the GDSs come out and blame the airline as not being “buyer focused” for doing this to them. It's classic GDS victim-hood at it's best (see Air Canada).
So while you won't catch us flying JetBlue just yet (simply not enough flights from ORD), we applaud them for providing meaningful product differentiation (i.e. not just a seatback TV and faux-hipster vibe). We also applaud mother nature, for dumping a (late) winter storm on Chicago today, giving us the perfect excuse to duck out early to watch the NCAA tournament. For those stuck on a cot at ORD - sorry, but these things happen for a reason.
JetBlue will reconfigure its Airbus A320 fleet to offer seats with more legroom, and will charge more for those seats. JetBlue is calling the product Even More Legroom, which will offer 38 inches of pitch in the second to fifth rows plus emergency exit rows 10 and 11... The airline will charge $10 each way for short-haul flights (under 600 miles), $15 for medium-haul flights (601 to 1,500 miles) and $20 for long-haul flights (over 1,500 miles).
That’s actually great – but there is also another kicker:
The airline won't be selling Even More Legroom in the GDSs because of "technological limitations," JetBlue said. But the airline added that clients who book via a GDS can go to the Manage Your Flight link on JetBlue's Web site to purchase the extra legroom.
A few FMV points:
1) OK, we just assumed that JetBlue’s marketing department had a down day when they branded their new refundable fare product “Refundable Fares”. But seriously, “Even More Legroom”? Please try a little harder to imply that the old coach seats don't have crappy legroom. You know who will REALLY hate this name?? The call center agents who face this scenario happening 100 times a day:
JetBlue Agent: “Hello, You have reached JetBlue – how may I help you”
Customer: “Uhh, Hi – I bought a seat for my upcoming trip, and I know I get a roomy seat, but I’d now like to purchase EVEN MORE LEGROOM!! Ha Ha Ha”
2) This also has “Ancillary Revenue” written all over it and kind of goes against the Jetblue vein. Fine – you don’t have a “business class” – but you now have the beginnings of tiered system…
3) Finally – and most importantly - we love the fact that this purchase option is not available in the GDS. It’s the mythical “Fourth Cabin” limitation of GDSs; they cannot inventory control this type of stuff, and therefore can’t sell it. But FMV will bet you $10 (Even More Legroom for a short-haul flight) that the GDSs come out and blame the airline as not being “buyer focused” for doing this to them. It's classic GDS victim-hood at it's best (see Air Canada).
So while you won't catch us flying JetBlue just yet (simply not enough flights from ORD), we applaud them for providing meaningful product differentiation (i.e. not just a seatback TV and faux-hipster vibe). We also applaud mother nature, for dumping a (late) winter storm on Chicago today, giving us the perfect excuse to duck out early to watch the NCAA tournament. For those stuck on a cot at ORD - sorry, but these things happen for a reason.
Wednesday, January 30, 2008
JetBlue: Labor Strife in Marketing Dept.?
We normally try to stick to the facts, but in this case we'll start a rumor. Something is amiss in the Marketing Department at JetBlue. It simply has to be.
Here is the skinny. As we understand it, the carrier observed that certain customer segments frequently change their travel plans, and may pay a premium for a fare that allows changes or refunds. On Monday, the carrier announced that, for those customers, there would be a new product offering flexibility and convenience that is cleverly named "Refundable Fares".
Hoo boy, that's rich. Refundable Fares? Seriously, someone please tell us they did not pay somebody to brand that? Is there a whiteboard somewhere with TrueRefund, BlueRefund, FlexBlue, and RefundaBLUE scratched out? What kind of a world do we live in, where a straightforward proposition does not need a snappy name?
Anyway, you get 4x TrueBlue points if you buy a Refundable Fare. So at least we know the marketing department is there. They just don't seem to be functioning at peak.
Here is the skinny. As we understand it, the carrier observed that certain customer segments frequently change their travel plans, and may pay a premium for a fare that allows changes or refunds. On Monday, the carrier announced that, for those customers, there would be a new product offering flexibility and convenience that is cleverly named "Refundable Fares".
Hoo boy, that's rich. Refundable Fares? Seriously, someone please tell us they did not pay somebody to brand that? Is there a whiteboard somewhere with TrueRefund, BlueRefund, FlexBlue, and RefundaBLUE scratched out? What kind of a world do we live in, where a straightforward proposition does not need a snappy name?
Anyway, you get 4x TrueBlue points if you buy a Refundable Fare. So at least we know the marketing department is there. They just don't seem to be functioning at peak.
Thursday, December 27, 2007
SideStep - "He Gone"
OK – we’ll interrupt our holiday festivities and comment on the Kayak / SideStep “Merger”. There are a lot of tidbits coming through so we thought we’d throw in a few cents from the FMV point of view:
First of all – Reports say that Kayak will only hire 20 of the company’s 75 employees, not including its chief executive, Rob Solomon.
Wow, nice timing on that one Kayak – right before the holidays. Merry Christmas SideStep – now you guys can include a resume in your holiday cards you’re sending out!! Try this on your next search site: From: Santa, To: Kayak, and you'll get a big lump of coal in all of your results.
Second , Kayak raked in $196 million in VC money to be able to pull this “Merger”.
FMV puts the word “Merger” in quotes (insert air finger motion here) simply because we always thought that the larger company buying out a smaller company was called a “Takeover” or "Buyout" – but it’s obvious we’re not finance guys…
Third, the financing round was led by prior investor Sequoia Capital – and also included General Catalyst Partners, Accel Partners, Norwest Venture Partners, Trident Capital, Oak Investment Partners and Lehman Brothers Venture Partners, Silicon Valley Bank and Gold Hill Capital.
We guess $196 million is a lot of money so you need a lot of players.. FMV thought about joining in as well, but Kayak called saying they were drawing a hard line at $196 million and therefore they didn’t need our extra $250 to pull off the round…
Fourth, Kayak says there is less than 10% overlap among Kayak and SideStep users. (subscription needed)
This one actually caught us a little off-guard. We're told time and time again “There is NO loyalty in the airline search market, people always check multiple sites”. But now we’re told that tens of millions of searchers have a very strong loyalty to their preferred meta-searcher and don’t cross check? Or maybe because people don't know more than one? Whatever the case - seems like a weird fact.
Finally - Kayak co-founder and CTO Paul English added: “As a native Bostonian, I am also personally gratified to finally see an East Coast technology firm purchasing a West Coast counterpart.”
OH YEAH BABY – IT’S ON !! West Coast Sucks !! It's like the rapper wars again - Biggie and Puff can take down Snoop Dog and 2PAC ANY DAY ! Don't bring your weak stuff in our house Silicon Valley !
Man, where did this quote come from?
Overall – interesting stuff. We always thought that a few of these guys would get taken out, we just didn’t look at them “Merging” with each other. If the 10% overlap part is true - nice play for Kayak on simply shortcutting the process and ramping up their scale.
It’ll also be interesting to see what happens now with FareCast and Mobissimo - will others just look at these companies and think that they can get in the market now on the cheap(er)? Although we think Mobissmo has a long long way to go.
First of all – Reports say that Kayak will only hire 20 of the company’s 75 employees, not including its chief executive, Rob Solomon.
Wow, nice timing on that one Kayak – right before the holidays. Merry Christmas SideStep – now you guys can include a resume in your holiday cards you’re sending out!! Try this on your next search site: From: Santa, To: Kayak, and you'll get a big lump of coal in all of your results.
Second , Kayak raked in $196 million in VC money to be able to pull this “Merger”.
FMV puts the word “Merger” in quotes (insert air finger motion here) simply because we always thought that the larger company buying out a smaller company was called a “Takeover” or "Buyout" – but it’s obvious we’re not finance guys…
Third, the financing round was led by prior investor Sequoia Capital – and also included General Catalyst Partners, Accel Partners, Norwest Venture Partners, Trident Capital, Oak Investment Partners and Lehman Brothers Venture Partners, Silicon Valley Bank and Gold Hill Capital.
We guess $196 million is a lot of money so you need a lot of players.. FMV thought about joining in as well, but Kayak called saying they were drawing a hard line at $196 million and therefore they didn’t need our extra $250 to pull off the round…
Fourth, Kayak says there is less than 10% overlap among Kayak and SideStep users. (subscription needed)
This one actually caught us a little off-guard. We're told time and time again “There is NO loyalty in the airline search market, people always check multiple sites”. But now we’re told that tens of millions of searchers have a very strong loyalty to their preferred meta-searcher and don’t cross check? Or maybe because people don't know more than one? Whatever the case - seems like a weird fact.
Finally - Kayak co-founder and CTO Paul English added: “As a native Bostonian, I am also personally gratified to finally see an East Coast technology firm purchasing a West Coast counterpart.”
OH YEAH BABY – IT’S ON !! West Coast Sucks !! It's like the rapper wars again - Biggie and Puff can take down Snoop Dog and 2PAC ANY DAY ! Don't bring your weak stuff in our house Silicon Valley !
Man, where did this quote come from?
Overall – interesting stuff. We always thought that a few of these guys would get taken out, we just didn’t look at them “Merging” with each other. If the 10% overlap part is true - nice play for Kayak on simply shortcutting the process and ramping up their scale.
It’ll also be interesting to see what happens now with FareCast and Mobissimo - will others just look at these companies and think that they can get in the market now on the cheap(er)? Although we think Mobissmo has a long long way to go.
Labels:
"Kellogg does Marketing",
"Scrapers",
Kayak,
SideStep
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

